FCC Chairman Wheeler pledges support for municipal broadband network efforts

Commissioner Wheeler once again showed his support for competition despite the accusations that he is in the pocket of the industry.  Much like his proposed net neutrality rules, allowing municipalities to enter the broadband market creates competition against the incumbents, albeit from a governmental entity.  This pro-consumer stance that is more than just speeches is refreshing in an industry that is just lumbering along.

Although I do not personally agree with any governmental entity entering the private sector, laws that have been passed also prevent governments from forming public/private partnerships with companies to build broadband infrastructure and networks.  The laws as written typically prevent a government from building their own fiber infrastructure and leasing that infrastructure to communications service providers unless they were grandfathered.  I believe that this model of “open access” is not only economical and taxpayer neutral, but extremely pro-competition since many different service providers can offer their services without a huge capital expenditure in a last-mile network.

Open access broadband infrastructure is the smarter way for municipalities to go because it reduces the financial risk of running a business in competition with the incumbent providers.  The financial results of municipalities running their own communications business are mixed at best.  There are several examples in the country (e.g. Vermont, Minnesota, and UTOPIA) where companies have gone bankrupt and left bond holders and taxpayers to clean up the mess.  If a municipality only leases the infrastructure then they have potentially several carriers paying for the fiber, and those companies combined will have a larger potential market share than if it was just them selling the services.  Also, their expenses are greatly reduced because they don’t have to purchase the content, buy the equipment, and maintain a much larger staff to sell, market, and service customers. 

I applaud Commissioner Wheeler’s move because it demonstrates that he is pro-business and not just another political lackey with a social or specific industry agenda.

 
Editorial Director and Associate Publisher

Character for children of FCC

Character for children of FCC”Broadband” (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

In an address to attendees at the National Cable and Telecommunications Association’s (NCTA) The Cable Show in Los Angeles yesterday, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Tom Wheeler expressed strong support for the right of municipalities to supply broadband services using their own networks. Wheeler pledged to “preempt” state laws that restrict the construction and operation of such networks.

As high-speed broadband becomes a more important aspect of residential and business life, several communities, particularly in rural areas, have become frustrated while waiting for incumbent service providers to upgrade their services. Some have decided to build their own networks, often using fiber to the home (FTTH) technology, withLafayette, LADalton, GA, and Chattanooga, TN, among the most high-profile examples.

Continue reading

Shawnee County selected to pilot broadband initiative

Another job for consultants without any appreciable results all at taxpayer expense.  If the community feels a need for better broadband services, then they probably do need better broadband services.  The consultants will spend the money to produce a nice report without any increase in broadband penetration.  Data are readily available for a county staff person to draft a high-level report outlining the issues and challenges then they could draft and RFI and provide it to several communications suppliers so they can provide their input as to how to improve broadband services in the county.  A wise commission would proceed down this path and save the money.  $6 million could serve approximately 10,000 homes which could easily eliminate a percent of those homes not currently served by any broadband access.  Municipalities and counties need to be wise on how they spend their money.

Surprising as it might seem, there are areas of Shawnee County that don’t have adequate access to the Internet.

“We have students, families and patrons of 372 who are currently underserved or unable to access quality and affordable broadband,” said Tim Hallacy, superintendent of Silver Lake Unified School District 372. This, he said, at a time when teaching and learning — not to mention business interests — rely heavily on quality Internet access.

Continue reading

AT&T thinks increased bandwidth costs are Netflix subscribers’ problem

The Netflix Original Series

[Image credit: Getty]

Editorial:  I should write a new blog based on all of the recent activities around Netflix.  I applaud Reed Hastings for bringing this issue back to the forefront of policy discussion.  The access providers or ISP are providing Internet access based on certain speeds that are generally much higher than a typical HD video stream, but subscribers received a reduced quality of experience (QoE) at peak periods of the day.  If the ISP is a cable company their video streams are not impacted because they are delivered outside the ISP pipe.  There is a bit of conflict of interest here.  Setting that aside for a moment. 

The ISP provide a best-effort service so if they can prove that they are providing the advertised bandwidth and not directly blocking any site, then they have met their terms of service.  The problem is that customers are not being served because they cannot fully enjoy the services that they purchase from other service providers.  In a competitive market, consumers would purchase Internet access from a competing provider that could deliver over-the-top (OTT) services properly, but we are stuck with a duopoly in most markets in the United States.  

The congestion happens at peering points when one provider interconnects with another provider.  Increasing bandwidth at peering points costs real money, but it is a cost borne by both the ISP and interconnection company.  The interconnection company builds that cost into their costs to their customers like Netflix.  This sharing of the burden is one of the major principles of the Internet.  The ISP benefits from providing a better quality service, but that argument works best in a competitive environment.  In our duopoly, the ISP act like cartels and band together to reduce their costs and protect their competing services.  Customers can’t walk because the other provider is no better than their current provider.

True last-mile competition is the ultimate answer, but that is the long-term solution.  In the meantime the Thomas Wheeler and the FCC Commissioners have to wrestle with this issue while being heavily influenced by lobbyists.  I like Reed Hastings’ proposal and do not feel that it is an undue burden on the ISP because the cost per bit is continually rapidly decreasing.  As a way to recoup some of these charges ISP should be allowed to sell managed services (i.e. QoS) to OTT providers like Netflix.  As I said at the beginning of this article, I should really write out the full proposal with cost-based arguments.

AT&T’s swinging back at Netflix CEO Reed Hastings’ recent assertion that ISPs (internet service providers) should shoulder the cost of increased bandwidth demands. In a post on AT&T’s Public Policy Blog, Senior EVP Jim Cicconi denounced Hastings’ desire for a “cost-free delivery” agreement with ISPs, saying that it unfairly shifts the burden of infrastructure cost to AT&T and its subscribers rather than to Netflix’s own customer base. As Cicconi views it, that subscriber base is the very one responsible for the increased traffic demands and resulting need to build out additional facilities, and should therefore bear the brunt of a fee hike.

Continue reading

AT&T, cable lobbying drive Chattanooga’s EPB to shelve network expansion bill

Market Square in Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA, ...

Image via Wikipedia

By Sean Buckley

EPB, the Chattanooga, Tenn.-based service provider known for its 1 Gbps service, and its supporters have decided to put on mothballs a new bill that would enable municipal broadband operators to expand outside of their service areas.

If the “Broadband Infrastructure for Regional Economic Development Act of 2011” bill had gone through, municipal-run broadband providers like EPB would have been able to extend service up to 30 miles outside their service areas. One of EPB’s motivating factors to have the bill was to bring service to Bradley County, where Amazon.com is building a second distribution center.

Continue reading

Editorial: Martin County officials should weigh potential benefits, risks before commercializing broadband cable network

Seal of Martin County, Florida

Image via Wikipedia

Proceed with caution.

Such is the posture Martin County commissioners should take toward the possibility of commercializing the county’s soon-to-be-installed broadband network.

Recently, commissioners voted 5-0 to spend $100,000 for expert advice to learn how the network could generate revenue and promote economic development and job creation.

In April, the County Commission and county School Board decided to build a broadband cable network. What prompted the decision? Comcast proposed raising rates for access to its dark fiber network to more than $1 million in 2013.

Installation of the county’s Community Broadband Network began two weeks ago and is scheduled for completion later this year. The new system will serve all public entities in Martin County.

Continue reading

Netflix and Akamai Reports Show Sustained Broadband Speeds Falter in U.S.

Image representing Netflix as depicted in Crun...

Image via CrunchBase

Nate Hakken, Reporter, BroadbandBreakfast.com

WASHINGTON, February 7, 2011 – Online content providers Netflix and Akamai released data recently indicating that U.S. internet service providers meet expectations for promised peak broadband speeds, but fall short when it comes to sustained speeds.

Netflix, which offers streaming video on-demand, released data and charts last month through its blog.  The company evaluated sustained downloads as part of its high definition streaming service specific to Internet Service Providers (ISP)s.

Continue reading

F.C.C. to Propose Expanding Broadband Service to Underserved Areas

By EDWARD WYATT

WASHINGTON — The Federal Communications Commission on Tuesday will propose the first steps toward converting the $8 billion fund that subsidizes rural telephone service into one for helping pay to provide broadband Internet service to underserved areas, according to commission officials.

Julius Genachowski, chairman of the F.C.C., is expected to call for a consolidation of existing methods of supporting rural phone service into a new pool of funds.

Continue reading